Sample Answer Ccts by Miss Emy Jong

National level in the public eye(predicate) examinations such as the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) and Sijil Pelajaran Tinggi Malaysia (STPM) take al sorts generated a muckle of liaison among the general public as they argon essential for get into universities and besides to drop into the work market. In the recent fewer years, attention has been draw to the phenomenon of educatees getting up to 20 As in the SPM examinations and this has been a source of broil especi ally with regards to comprehension assignation and university placements.The establishment consequently has been mulling a decision to raft a marge on the maximal subject of subjects a nonifydidate whitethorn sit for as a carriage to simplify the plectron passage into 3rd studies. The generator of this hold, Dr. I. Lourdesamy of the pacific Institute technology in Petaling Jaya offers his views on this development and the article is aptly title SPM Subjects Let savants institute the ch oice. Basically, the generator is of the perspicacity that setting a cap on the number of subjects a student whitethorn sit for does non address the echt issue of fit selection criteria into 3rd nurture, and he goes on to suggest how we may best semi the issue by giving his recommendations as well as what he feels the aspiration of education should be. The writer proposes that we should non limit the number of subjects SPM students can sit for, and kinda students can be evaluated on the reason of their performance in subjects without delay cogitate to the proposed written report of guide.He is disagreeable to moderate students probability to learn, and feels that the students should be allowed to decide on their own goals ground on their mental ability and aptitude. He as well suggests that schools offer a range of electoral subjects to cater to several(predicate) student interests. Furtherto a greater extent, the writer opines that most students grant ove rly a lot free age and genuinely should be encouraged to do to a greater extent(prenominal) than.Finally, the writer addresses the essential objective of education to provide opportunity for its students to maximize their information potential. Personally, I meet the writers argument of non check the number of subjects for SPM students to be level-headed and logical. As he said earlier, if the take is the assessment process for scholarships and places in universities then what we lead is a clear and countywide guideline on the selection criteria for the conf utilized disciplines in 3rd education.Actually, the practice of pickings into account b atomic number 18ly subjects which be directly relevant to the proposed field of study has ample been practiced and limiting the number of subjects would not help in any way to determine which students are more deserve of university placements or scholarships. What students engage to be do aware of is that they motivat ing to prepare for their desire field of study by fetching relevant subjects which would be necessary in the selection process.The precedents arguments on allowing students to decide on their own goals found on their expertness and aptitude, besides having schools offer elective subjects are indeed sound suggestions. Having g wizard through and through the path of cosmos a student myself, I potently feel that if students are given more say in what they are studying, it ordain make them more motivated and acute to learn. They can also be challenged appropriately, and the scenario of having students macrocosm bored (because the computer program is in addition at large(p) or uninteresting) or not organism able to attach to lessons (because they are too weak) will be greatly reduced.However, the implementation of such suggestions may be real difficult as a lot of resources will need to be make available to schools and students. We would corroborate to first withdra w a large enough kitten of competent thatched roofers to teach students these various subjects at all levels of difficulty, and take out the logistics such as allocation of classrooms and magazine-tabling could also put forward actually challenging. Students use of their free time was also one of the points raised in the article. The reason simply feels that students could be more productive and that they do not obligate such(prenominal) to do. art object there may be approximately truth to his argument, I think that it is not fair to generalise and say that all students are too free and should be asked to do more. How much time a student actually spends on his studies and separate worthwhile activities differs greatly from one student to another. It really depends on the individuals motivation and goals. rough students who are already pushing themselves very hard should actually be taught to slack and have more balance in their life. Therefore, this argument shows the authors preconceived notion towards students nowadays and he should give more careful aspect to this before qualification such conclusions.